🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 716+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Vintage Bolivia clock

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.7 out of 5 (716 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$7​
$11.67
Sale
βœ“ at no charge shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Bulova Quartz LiteAlarm Desktop Clock. Condition is Used. Runs superb!

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express fulfillment
↩️
hassle-complimentary Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Bolivia clock

Bulova Quartz LiteAlarm Desktop Clock. Condition is Used. Runs magnificent!

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 604715

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Clocks

Original Price: $11.67 USD

Sale Price: $7 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2767 reviews
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Miami, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly propose!​
In daily use, the Vintage Bolivia clock is uncomplicated to use and it’s fine overall. Packaging was elementary.
12 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· San Antonio, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So glad I bought this
Honestly, the Vintage Bolivia clock is practical so it’s acceptable.
42 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· San Jose, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptional
After a few days, the Vintage Bolivia clock works as described and I’m satisfied. No setup issues.
39 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill
9 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†​
Highly endorse!
The Vintage Bolivia clock is hassle-complimentary to handle.
24 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
highly pleased
The Vintage Bolivia clock works as expected.
17 people found this helpful