🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 353+ reviews
Home βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Shark Ion Robot Vacuum

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.3 out of 5 (353 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$200
$333.33
Sale
βœ“ at no charge shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Baught this and not ever used it. Thanks for looking

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express fulfillment
↩️
hassle-complimentary Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Shark Ion Robot Vacuum

Baught this and not ever used it. Thanks for looking​

This product is splendid for anyone looking for quality Home products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 482903

Category: Home > Cleaning Supplies > Sweeping

Original Price: $333.33 USD

Sale Price: $200 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1351 reviews
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier​
Good experience overall Shark Ion Robot Vacuum.
13 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Denver, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
outstanding for my needs
After certain use, it works well enough and it meets expectations.
14 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
impeccable purchase
Personally, the Shark Ion Robot Vacuum performs as expected and it’s fine overall. Nothing fancy.
30 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
adore it!
From my experience, the Shark Ion Robot Vacuum works as described and I’m satisfied.
12 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
I was worried about quality, but the Shark Ion Robot Vacuum turned out fine.
13 people found this helpful