🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 107+ reviews
Vintage āœ“ In Stock šŸ”„ Bestseller

Vintage Sterling Nautical Cufflinks

ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜… 4.1 out of 5 (107 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$9.82
$16.37
Sale
āœ“ at no charge shipment on this item • Limited time offer

Vintage Sterling Nautical style Cufflinks.Ships Wheel rendering.Stamped 925 and Italy on back. Shined up.

šŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid fulfillment
ā†©ļø
uncomplicated Returns

šŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Sterling Nautical Cufflinks

Vintage Sterling Nautical style Cufflinks.
Ships Wheel rendering.
Stamped 925 and Italy on back.
Shined up.​

This product is magnificent for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

šŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 190537

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Cuff Links

Original Price: $16.37 USD

Sale Price: $9.82 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 distribution & Returns

āœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Based on 107 reviews
JD
John Davidson āœ“ Verified
4 weeks ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Exactly What I Needed​
Personally, the Vintage Sterling Nautical Cufflinks works well enough and I’m satisfied. Works fine so far.
WG
William Garcia āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Highly propose Vintage Sterling Nautical Cufflinks
From my experience, the Vintage Sterling Nautical Cufflinks feels solid and I’m satisfied. Works fine so far.
AP
Adam Parker āœ“ Verified
3 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
fabulous Value for Money
The Vintage Sterling Nautical Cufflinks works perfectly and feels tough.
AD
Amanda Davis āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Highly urge Vintage Sterling Nautical Cufflinks
Satisfied with this Vintage Sterling Nautical Cufflinks purchase.
MK
Megan King āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
extraordinary Quality
The Vintage Sterling Nautical Cufflinks works simply fine.